Turkey's UAP Incident: Aerial Lights Observed
Luminous reddish-orange spheres, that display unusual characteristics, are a type of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) that has been reported in both recent and historical records. In the compilation of eyewitness testimonies, there is a wide array of credible accounts from nuclear power stations, experienced witnesses, and different members of the public. Descriptions range from just one red or orange sphere to three or even more objects.
Over the years, witnesses have described them as: radiant, pulsating, mesmerizing, like a tiny sun, Appearing unexpectedly and then disappearing. Sometimes there are known explanations, but there are still times when the unusual lights show odd behaviors that are hard to explain. An excellent example is this illustration by the artist showing the UAP reported over Malmstrom Air Force Base in 1967, which resulted in the shutdown of 10 ICBMs.
Artist Illustration Of 1967 Malmstrom AFB UFO
Unusual Light Phenomenon And The UAP Events In Turkey
Across three years of video evidence, there was a steady occurrence of unusual glowing spheres amongst the multiple objects witnessed and filmed over the Marmara Sea.There is a notable pattern of these orbs in the original footage, which can be fully viewed on this blog and other sources. It has not yet been fully established whether there is a correlation between the recorded structured physical objects and the spherical lights. Additional analysis is needed to move toward a better understanding of their source. Upon thorough examination of the raw footage, I observed several noticeable trends that sparked my curiosity.
Different characteristics were noticed in the original video.
-- There are instances when a lone light sphere appears in the sky above the water, while on other occasions, these lights have been observed in formations of two, three, four, and six.
-- Generally, luminous lights were seen shortly before and after the presence of non-illuminated structured aerial objects, with a few instances where both types appeared together.
-- Every object was situated above the sea, with the sole exception of 7-30-07.
-- As far as I know, there are no identifiable structures such as docks, buoys, oil drilling platforms, markers, or military bases that could have been misinterpreted from the camera's viewpoint. However, further investigation may lead to different conclusions.
-- Most of the sightings and video recordings happened from 1:30 AM to 6:00 AM with a couple exceptions.Why did these strange events occur at night when most people were asleep?
-- At times, the physical structured UAPs that were recorded at night evolved into spherical light anomalies that lingered briefly right after the sun rises.
Examples
July 2, 2008 at 4:44 AM
On July 2, 2008, at 4:44 AM, the footage captures a brightly illuminated, round-shaped object in the early morning sky above the Marmara Sea.
July 2, 2008 at 5:15 AM
A total of thirty-one minutes later that morning, an array of orange lights became visible over the water, located in the vicinity of the earlier UAP sighting. Since the first object was filmed at night, determining the distance between these two occurrences is difficult. Nevertheless, it is clear that both sightings of unidentified orbs took place over the Marmara Sea and were documented from Kumburgaz, Turkey.
July 9, 2008 at 9:03 PM
On June 9, 2008 additional footage was captured of a different object. The video depicts the UAP seemingly stationary while exhibiting a slight pulsation. Notably, a clear reflection on the water suggests that something is actually there, rather than just being a camera glitch.
June 6, 2008 at 2:00 AM
Another luminous sphere was captured on June 6, 2008, at 2:00 AM.
May 29, 2008 at 1:36 AM
This footage captures this spherical anomaly on May 29, 2008
July 4, 2008 at 5:21 AM
On this date, Yalcin Yalman recorded what seems to be a physically structured object in the middle of the night, without any daylight. Following the sunrise at 5:21 AM, he continued to observe the water from his position. In a manner consistent with previous observations, he spotted another sphere of light and documented it on film.
July 4, 2008 at 5:52 AM
The spherical light remains stationary, showing no signs of movement, and continues to be observable 32 minutes later that morning.. The exact length of time it was present is unclear because we can only look at what has been recorded.
July 4, 2008 at 5:53 AM
In this part of the video, Yalcin focuses on a closer view of the anomaly from July 4, 2008.
June 16, 2008 at 5:25 AM
On the morning of June 16, 2008, an array of pulsating orange lights was observed at an early hour. It is important to emphasize that in this segment of the Marmara Sea, there are no recorded installations, including buoys, oil platforms, or training ranges, that could explain the sighting and recording. This UAP is particularly intriguing due to its exact similarity in both visual characteristics and location to the lights that were documented on July 2, 2008.
July 30, 2007 at 5:15 AM
(AM and PM were backwards in 2007)
Yalcin Yalman, along with a group of local residents, observed and recorded a round orange-yellow light outside his father's apartment.
After a brief period, it began to traverse horizontally to the right, ultimately going behind the apartment building and out of view.
May 15, 2009 at 5:21 AM
On May 15, 2009, shortly after capturing footage of an unidentified metallic, disk-shaped object over the ocean, several orange-red spherical lights became visible once more. At 5:21 AM, the above frame captures a singular anomaly positioned at an altitude that is strikingly similar to those observed in earlier years.
6 Minutes Later at 5:27 AM
Captured during the same segment of video, six minutes later, was a semi-circular arch formation consisting of four pulsating orange lights.
11 Minutes Later at 5:32 AM
This intriguing semi-circular arrangement of unusual lights captured six minutes later stands out as one of the most fascinating and compelling parts of the entire Turkish incident.
May 23, 2008 at 4:53 AM
Theories About Gravity, Space And Light Waves
The scientific community has put forth several hypothetical theories that seek to explain the reasons behind the observed effects exhibited by certain Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs).The most well-known theoretical model for a warp drive is the Alcubierre drive, proposed by Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre in 1994. The spacecraft would be contained within a "warp bubble," a region of spacetime that is distorted, allowing for faster-than-light travel. While the concept of a warp drive is intriguing, it remains a theoretical possibility, and the required technology and understanding of physics are far beyond our current capabilities.
The general concept of warp drive was introduced by John W. Campbell in his 1957 novel Islands of Space. Brave New Words gave the earliest example of the term "space-warp drive" as Fredric Brown's Gateway to Darkness (1949), and also cited an unnamed story from Cosmic Stories (May 1941) as using the word "warp" in the context of space travel, although the usage of this term as a "bend or curvature" in space which facilitates travel can be traced to several works as far back as the mid-1930s, for example Jack Williamson's The Cometeers (1936).
In 2021, DARPA-funded researcher Harold White, of the Limitless Space Institute, claimed that he had succeeded in creating a real warp bubble, saying "our detailed numerical analysis of our custom Casimir cavities helped us identify a real and manufacturable nano/microstructure that is predicted to generate a negative vacuum energy density such that it would manifest a real nanoscale warp bubble, not an analog, but the real thing.
Gravity And Light Are Related
Gravity and light are related because gravity warps spacetime, and light follows the curvature of spacetime, causing its path to bend around massive objects, a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing. According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, gravity isn't just a force, but a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Light, even though it has no mass, follows the paths of least resistance through spacetime, which are the curved paths caused by gravity. Gravity can also affect the energy and frequency of light, causing phenomena like gravitational redshift, where light loses energy as it climbs out of a gravitational well.
One popular theory suggests that the lights seen from UFOs might be a result of advanced propulsion technologies. This idea includes possibilities like anti-gravity systems or electromagnetic propulsion. Supporters of this theory believe that the quick movements and variations in light brightness match what we would expect from these kinds of propulsion methods. Some researchers have proposed that these lights could represent a type of energy manipulation, where the object changes its environment to reach amazing speeds and agility.
While scientists have not reached a consensus on how UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) might alter light, it is important to understand that gravity can bend light through a phenomenon called gravitational lensing. Light also bends when it passes through different materials. Just like a black hole bends light and distorts spacetime, the area surrounding a UAP can bend light and electromagnetic signals, which makes them hard to spot with regular radar.
Is there a relationship between the orange-reddish orbs and spherical lights seen in Yalcin's footage from Turkey and the metallic looking structured objects, or is it merely a coincidence? Currently, there is no clear answer to that question, and without further data, we may never be able to know for sure.
Unknown objects presented themselves differently in the same area on the same days. Is it one object or are there two different ones?
Below, you will find examples and comparisons of individual frames taken directly from video. It’s important to highlight that we cannot determine how long each unidentified object was present in the location. This is because Yalcin was consistently trying to extend battery life, which was limited on these older cameras. This resulted in many short to medium-length clips, as he managed to capture enough objects without using up the battery. Thus, we can only rely on what was actually recorded. (Note the AM and PM in a portion of 2007 were backwards)
Example #1
July 30, 2007
4:50 AM and 5:15 AM
25 Minute Difference
Example #2
May 29, 2008
1:36:55 AM and 2:38:16 AM
One Hour and 1:21 Minute Difference
Example #3
July 4, 2008
2:42:47 AM and 5:21:00 AM
1 Hour 58 Minute Difference
Example #4
May 15, 2009
4:59 AM and 5:32 AM
33 Minute Difference
Example #5
August 24, 2007
4:00 AM and 4:03 AM
3 Minute Difference
Example #6
July 2, 2008
3:53:17 AM and 4:44:18 AM
51 Minute 1 Second Difference
Example #7
July 2, 2008
3:53:17 AM and 5:15:17 AM
1 Hour 22 Minute Difference
Example #8
August 7, 2007
5:07 AM and 5:09 AM
2 Minute Difference
Example #9
June 6, 2008
1:59:41 AM and 2:00:45 AM
1 Minute 4 Second Difference
There are still many unanswered questions about the real nature of the glowing orbs and their possible relationship with solid objects. What is known is that these lights were repeatedly observed and captured on film during the incident over the Marmara Sea in Turkey. While some explanations may be simple, no one has yet presented evidence to determine their source. The most fascinating part is the high frequency of orb sightings, not their quality.
In recent decades, the phenomenon of pulsating aerial light anomalies, which can be red, orange, or in various shades, has remained a global enigma. A growing number of people are seeing them. If the "light anomalies" observed in the footage are truly the same objects that display an organized and physical presence, it generates a host of further questions that could enhance our understanding of these phenomena.
No comments:
Post a Comment