Wednesday, February 26, 2025

June 12, 2008 Sighting

 


June 12, 2008 Unidentified Object

On a summer night in Kumburgaz, Turkey, the weather was clear, and the moon was particularly bright. Local residents had seen UFOs as recently as June 9th, and with a series of sightings throughout the past year, there was increased attention directed towards the skies in the area. The footage from June 12, 2008, is especially intriguing, as it appears to capture a dome-shaped object resembling the commonly reported "disc."


Sea Of Marmara, Turkey

In the background, two of Yalcin's friends, who are known witnesses, can be heard as they stand on the beach, watching the unidentified object above the sea. A significant transition of light and shadow sweeps across the reflective surface as the object begins to move slowly from side to side in the sky. Frame captures of this moment are included below.


Shiny metallic like texture - Curved upper half, semi flat bottom edge


There is a shifting shade pattern that occurs as the object moves from left to right.



Overhead View Of Sighting Area

Raw Video Footage From June 12, 2008:


Yalcin and one of his friends look for a good vantage point.






June 12th, 2008 was just one day of what ended up being a series of 26 separate days over a period of 3 years. As to exactly why these unknown craft came back to the same location over and over remains a mystery. One speculation is that perhaps they have been coming to this location for many centuries. There is a lot of historic information that dates back many years that suggests these sightings are nothing new.

A Closer Look Behind The "TUBITAK" Report" On The Kumburgaz Case



A lot of people may have heard about the report that was issued by the Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey, which inspected the original cassettes and issued a written statement after reaching a conclusion. This post will provide more information on the specific individuals involved, their resumes, and the circumstances that preceded.

Let's start at the beginning. After the footage of unknown objects taken by Yalcin was public, a debate between the skeptical society and the Turkish UFO community began to proliferate. Soon thereafter multiple theories were offered by skeptics and Yalcin was being labeled a hoaxer, despite zero evidence to suggest he was. These types of disagreements are nothing new in the field of Ufology. Finally both sides appeared on a highly rated national television show in Turkey to try and reach some type of conclusion.

On the TV show called "The Reporter" hosted by Tolga Ozdeniz the different sides appeared on a round table. The popular show is similar to the Turkish version of Larry King or 60 Minutes. Astronomy lecturer Professor Dr. Adnan Öktem from the TUG Observatory and TUBITAK and Haktan Akdogan a noted Turkish UFO investigator deliberated their difference of opinion on national television. During the show Haktan offered Dr. Oktem the opportunity to inspect the cassettes at the National Observatory Image Processing Unit a division of The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey were Dr. Oktem worked. The results of their study can be read in a previous post here: Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey Report


Individuals Involved:

Astronomy lecturer Prof. Dr. Adnan Oktem, University Dept. of physics lecturer Prof. Dr. Mehmet Emin, Film and Television Director Tarkan Ozel, Psychiatrist Prof. Dr. Kerem Doksat,
Professional backgrounds for each are at the end of this post.

During the live national T.V. broadcast an agreement was made to have the Mini DV cassettes inspected in the laboratory at TUBITAK headquarters.


Haktan handed the original cassettes over to Dr. Adnan Okten for inspection by experts within Istanbul University and The Science and Technology Board. For several days speculation grew as they waited for the results.


A follow up episode was broadcast close to a week later. And the reporters brought their cameras to the TUG National Observatory for an announcement.


Then a 2 page official report was released to the media.


The analysis and inspection of the DV cassettes by their experts found no evidence of tampering, forgery, or manipulation. Full text of the report is posted below.

Here is the segment aired on "The Reporter" hosted by Tolga Ozdeniz.


Included are comments made by the skeptics before and after the analysis was done. Once the cassettes were analyzed by TUBITAK and found no evidence of forgery, the critics statements began to change. Of course unidentified doesn't necessarily mean alien, but for a major scientific institution that is highly influential in the region, to admit that the film shows an unidentified flying object is a step forward.

Text Of The Report:

Mr. Tolga Özdeniz

ATV Channel - Program Editor

On January 31, 2008, a MiniDV format video cassette holding 35 minutes of footage was brought over to "TUBITAK" The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey’s (a Scientific Institution owned by the state that is highly reliable and influential) National Observatory (TUG) by Mr.Tolga Ozdeniz, the Editor of "Reporter" that has been aired on ATV Channel. The footage on the cassette was said to have been recorded by a Canon GL1 MiniDV digital camera on a beach of a holiday village in Kumburgaz/Istanbul by an amateur.

The images were examined by TUG - National Observatory Image Processing Unit. Because, it would take quite a long time to analyze all of the images, only randomly selected parts were pre-examined. During this process, emphasis was not placed on images produced by optical clarification effects which a number of point light sources generated.

The examination of these frames has yielded following results:

- The images were recorded in digital NTSC format by above-mentioned camera.

- The date on the video indicates that the recordings were made during 2007, 2008, and 2009.

- The footage images of the object which visibly have a certain configuration are not computer animations, special video effects or studio re-created images or models. The footage is genuine.

- The first observation made from the footage is that some of the images were recorded in nighttime sky at a certain altitude from the horizon. The footage also covers images of moon in some parts which proves that the video was shot in nighttime and open air. But, the fact that digital date display’s showing AM in certain frames and PM in others, raises suspicion about the validity of the time in which the recordings were made.

- Since in some parts, there is no other object that can be featured as a reference in the close-up frames and no observable differences were found on background examination, the actual location, distance, dimensions and nature of the objects could not have been determined.

- Through the examination of shootings of multiple dates, it’s a strong possibility that 2-3 different objects were captured. However, it’s difficult to determine whether the objects are moving or not. Their movement is slow even if they do so.

- The reflections of light on the objects are sometimes caused by moon which was in a convenient location at that time, and sometimes produced by some other sources of light.

- The light reflection from the left side of the object which is seen on August 10th shootings is not produced by the moon. At that time, the moon was in a phase that was pretty close to the "new moon" phase and located approximately at a 10 degrees proximity/angle to the horizon. Moreover, the image processing analysis conducted on some part of the footage revealed that the center of the object has the same density as its background, namely is of a transparent nature.

In conclusion, even though a detailed analysis of the footage is conducted, it might still remain unidentified. Hence, other reference objects need to be recorded in the same frame with the disputable object and further shootings need to be done by ourselves with special equipment in the same location and conditions.

Accordingly, the term "UFO" (Unidentified Flying Object) which has been used for these sort of dubious objects can also be used for these objects. But, this definition does not mean that these objects are from extraterrestrial (flying saucer etc.) origin.

Prof. phD. Zeki EKER Director
National Observatory of TUBITAK

Turkey Science and Technology Board Homepage

Documents:



The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey


The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) is the leading agency for management, funding and conduct of research in Turkey. It was established in 1963 with a mission to advance science and technology, conduct research and support Turkish researchers. The Council is an autonomous institution and is governed by a Scientific Board whose members are selected from prominent scholars from universities, industry and research institutions.

TUBITAK is responsible for promoting, developing, organizing, conducting and coordinating research and development in line with national targets and priorities. TUBITAK acts as an advisory agency to the Turkish Government on science and research issues, and is the secretary of the Supreme Council for Science and Technology (SCST), the highest science and technology policy making body in Turkey.



Istanbul University


Istanbul University is a prominent Turkish university located in Istanbul. The main campus is adjacent to Beyazıt Square in the Fatih district, on the European side of the city. The university has a teaching staff of 2,000 professors and associates and 4,000 assistants and younger staff. More than 60,000 undergraduate and 8,000 postgraduate students follow the courses offered by Istanbul University every year.

PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUNDS

Prof. Dr. Adnan Okten

Professor, Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, 1978 - Continued
Department Head of Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, 03/13/2013 - Ongoing


Curriculum Taught:
Sun World Climate Effects, Master of Science, 2013-2014
Global Astronomy, MA, 2013-2014
Advanced Astrometry I, MA, 2012-2013
Global Astronomy, MA, 2012-2013


Dr. Adnan Okten's Directed Studies

Ph.D.,"Active Solar prominence to a method of 3-D Computer Aided Determination of the Structure", Istanbul University, in January, 1998.

Ph.D.,"the problem of asymmetry of the Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectrum",University of Istanbul, in January, 1998.

"Investigation of Characteristics of sunspots Nest", University of Istanbul, in January, 1999.

Master, "Satellite Viewing" Istanbul University, in January, 1992.

"Physical and Morphological Study of Solar Cycle 22 at the University Observatory Observed Article Exit Event", University of Istanbul, in January, 1991.

Dr. Adnan Okten's Committee Memberships

Proficiency, Interview of Graduate Students, July 2013
Thesis defense, the jury M.Sc., M.Sc. jury in December 2013
Competence, Ph.D. Qualifying Examination, April 2013
Competence, Qualifying Committee, September 2013
Competence, Ph.D. Qualifying Exam, Ph.D. December 2013

Dr. Zeki Eker
Director - TUBITAK National Observatory 2007-2012


1978 - graduated from Istanbul University Faculty of Science Astronomy department.
1980-1986 University of Wisconsin in the United States in the field of astrophysics PhD

2005 - Canakkale University professor in the Department of Physics
 2009 - Akdeniz University Physics Department, Faculty of Science
2010 - Space Science and Technology Department Akdeniz University
August 1, 2012 - End of term of the National Observatory Task Manager

Prof. Dr. Mehmet Emin


2007-2012, Director of the Astrophysics Research Center TUBITAK Institute
of Science and Technology Space Observation Research Center
1990 - Professor of Physics Univ. of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
1974 - 1979 Ph.D. in Physics, METU Physics Dept., Ankara
1965 –‘70 B.Sc. in Physics; Middle East Tech.Univ. (METU) Ankara - Turkey
1970 - 1972 M.Sc. in Physics; METU, Ankara


Prof. Dr. Mehmet Emin's Committee Membership:

New York Academy of Sciences (1986 - 1994)
American Physical Society (1986 - 1989) 
 American Association for Advancement of Science (1990 - 1999) 
 Turkish Physical Society (1975 - 1990)  
Turkish Astronomical Society (1991 - present )


Tarkan Ozel

Film & Television Director (Special Effects)


30 years in television production and cinema, worked for CNN Turk television news, owner of television and video production company Ozel FX
http://www.ozelfx.com

Prof. Dr. Kerem Doksat


Dr. Kerem Doksat is a clinical psychiatrist focusing on elderly psychiatry with continued work in psychiatric hospitals in Nisantasi, Istanbul. Expertise in psychometric testing, psychological assessments, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. http://www.doksat.com/

More Links:


Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Q & A With A Group Of Local Witnesses In Kumburgaz, Turkey



The following interview was conducted by a television news outlet shortly after one of the sightings. The questions were conducted with a group of local inhabitants at the Yeni Kent, Kumburgaz, the location of the sightings. During the interview Yalcin reveals that, over time, approximately 20 people have witnessed the unknown objects with him.

Reporter: "We went to the tourist center Yeni Kent to find the people who accompanied Yalcin Yalman the single man who filmed the extraordinary evidence, demonstrating the authenticity of the case."




Haktan Akdogan: "These are some of the people who saw it. All the kids witnessed the UFO fly over the water. This is the compound just here in this place by the beach is were Yalcin Yalman recorded the videos."

Haktan Akdogan: "Usually they appeared over the sea here and went upwards silently to finish around this place. Then headed toward the city. Many people saw it fly over the housing complex here. And one of them here is going to talk."

Witness #1


Witness # 1: "The first time saw them was between 3:00 and 5:30 am, but not every night. I have been witness to this. They had their lights on."

Reporter: "What are your comments about what you saw?"

Witness # 1: "I don't agree with what the skeptics say, because I know that I saw them with my own two eyes."


Reporter:"Four more people spotted ufos with you when it was recorded is that true?"
>
Witness # 1: "Yes I saw it and there was no doubt that it was real."

Yalcin Yalman


Reporter: "So Yalcin Yalman when you record them what do you think?"

Yalcin Yalman: "I have seen it 7 times in 3 years I have recorded several times with people (witnesses) who were there and I calculate they are around 20 people."

Witness #2


Witness # 2: "I saw a very intense, extremely bright light. It stayed there in the sky. By the way it moved I think this definitely goes against the laws of gravity."

Witness # 2: "After staying there for a while it started to grow bigger like this and it suddenly disappeared."

Reporter: "What do the local inhabitants think about Yalcin Yalman?"

Witness # 2:  "Yalcin Yalman spends most of his time recording he is usually accompanied by witnesses, that is the reason we are convinced that this is about authentic objects. We are witness of it."


Reporter: "How important do you think this is?"

Witness # 2: "What I saw is very significant for me, and it is also very significant for humanity?"

Here is the interview (with subtitles in english):



The interview provides some new details about what happened. Of course having multiple eyewitnesses is an important factor to consider when determining the credibility of a UFO case. According to the second witness at one point there was a bright ball of light which ascended upwards and disappeared. The group of kids saw the ufos from the housing complex nearby. Haktan Akdogan explained the location were they appeared and that towards the end flew over the city. Previously I have written that there were approximately 12 witnesses, but it appears that number is more like twenty.

Below is another video which shows several witnesses. It was taken at a separate time outside a conference in Turkey when a large group of people spotted a bright light darting across the sky. What makes this most interesting is that it happened on May 14, 2009 in between May 13, 15, and 17 which the 2009 Kumburgaz UFO video was taken.

Istanbul, Turkey May 14th, 2009


There is still more to be learned about what happened and it continues to remain a mystery.


More Blog Posts

Monday, February 24, 2025

Turkey NATO Air Force Bases And UFO Sightings



As the Marmara Sea and Turkish Straits are situated in a increasingly militarized and strategic region of the middle east, what is their importance in relation to the Kumburgaz case. With larger NATO allied nations possessing jets and helicopters equipped with more sophisticated censors and advanced photographic capabilities they are more capable than ever. Discussed in this post are the geographic locations of Turkish, NATO, and U.S. air bases in Turkey.

Historically there are several incidents in other countries that involved a military response to unidentified aircraft within a nation's airspace. Take for example the 1976 Tehran UFO Incident was a radar and visual sighting of an unidentified flying object (UFO) over Tehran, the capital of Iran, during the early morning hours of 19 September 1976. During the incident, two F-4 Phantom II jet interceptors reported losing instrumentation and communications as they approached, only to have them restored upon withdrawal; one of the aircraft also reported suffering temporary weapons systems failure, while preparing to open fire.

And more recently it was reported that UFO sightings have stumped numerous military groups in India, including their air force, NTRO technical intelligence agency and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police when more than 100 UFOs were been seen along the India-China border between Aug. 1 and Oct. 15 of 2012. The sightings, which have officials puzzled, were of yellowish spheres that appeared to lift off from the horizon on the Chinese side and slowly traverse the sky for three to five hours before disappearing.

- After the Cyprus conflict Turkey decided to close down all the American bases on its territory, except for those that also implied NATO activities. Although two bases were left open run by Turkish, British, and American personnel focused only on NATO operations.

- The Turkish Air Force and aerial warfare service branch, not any other country, has the primary responsibility for intercepting unknown aircraft and protecting Turkish airspace.

Detailed Below Are Some Of The Strategic Military Air Base Locations Near The Sighting Area.

Izmir Air Force Base Turkey - NATO


Izmir Air Base is 200 miles southwest of the witness location. Currently it is operated by the
Turkish Air Force and NATO command including some USAF.



Izmir Air Force Base, Turkey is one of the strategic military installations with US Air Force personnel in Europe. The Izmir Air Station is the oldest NATO base in Turkey and its importance has increased in recent years. The headquarters of NATO’s Allied Air Component Command for Southern Europe has been located in Izmir since August 11, 2004. Although the base is seen as being run by the Americans, it is not quite like that. The United States of America are not among Turkey’s best friends. It now it mostly concentrates on NATO activities. The USAF squadron does everything normally accomplished by a wing, with the exception of operations.

Incirlik Air Force Base Turkey - NATO

NATO’s Incirlik Base, which is located eight kilometers (five miles) east of Adana, Turkey’s fifth largest city, and 56 kilometers (35 miles) from the Mediterranean Sea, is an important regional logistical air base. The base is near Ardana, the fifth most important city in Turkey, close to the Middle East. The population is mostly American – over 5000 troops. However, the base also hosts a few hundred British and Turkish soldiers. The place has two runways. One is 3 km long, while the secondary one is about 2.7 km. Turkey allows the United States to use the air base for operations associated with its air campaign against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Between 2007 and 2009 the US used Incirlik to launch operations mostly in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Incrilik Base is located 473 miles southeast from the witness location.


With the ongoing situation in the middle east the United States uses the Izmir Air Base, with permission from Turkey, for operations in nearby Syria and also Iraq both bordering countries.

Akinci Air Base TAF 4th Air Wing

Akıncı AFB hosted the 4th Air Wing of the Turkish Air Force's 1st Air Force Command. It opened in 1960 with the purpose of defending Ankara. On April 25, 1996, the nuclear mission at the Akıncı AFB was deactivated following the end of the Cold War. Before July 2016 six Weapons Storage and Security System vaults were operational in stand-by status at the air base. During the July 2016 coup attempt Akıncı runway thresholds were bombed to prevent pro-coup forces from landing or taking off. Following the failed coup, Akıncı Air Base was redesignated. Initially named "Murted" the base is currently used by Turkish Aerospace Industries which is the center of technology in design, development, manufacturing, integration of aerospace systems, and modernization.


Bandırma Airport TAF 6th Air Force Wing


Bandirma is a military airbase and public airport located at Bandırma in the Balıkesir Province, Turkey. It is home to the 6th Air Wing of the 1st Air Force Command of the Turkish Air Force. Of the installations in Turkey it is one of the least frequently used.

Bandirma is 50.4 miles across the sea from the sighting area.


Balıkesir Base TAF 9th Air Force Wing


Balıkesir is a military airport in the city of Balıkesir, Turkey home to the 9th Air Wing of the 1st Air Force Command of the Turkish Air Force. Other wings of this command are located in Eskisehir, Konya, Ankara, Akıncı, and Bandırma.

Balikesir is 99.2 miles from Kumburgaz.


Were Any Military Or Air Force Exercises Taking Place?

To see if this is possible the first thing I did was check the annual drill known as "Anatolian Eagle" to find out of this operation or any other were taking place at the time of Yalcin's filming.

Anatolian Eagle Joint Turkey NATO Air Force Exercise

 Anatolian Eagle is an air force exercise hosted by the Turkish Air Force and held in Konya, Turkey. There are both national and international exercises held, the international exercises usually involving air arms of the United States, other NATO forces, and Asian countries. Anatolian Eagle exercises simulate a war-time environment and the difficulty level increases from easy to hard. First the training exercise is planned in the 'White Headquarters' building. Training is monitored with computers to help test knowledge, abilities and find deficiencies of the participants. The scenarios consist of a "Blue Team" which attacks tactical and strategic targets in a "Red Land" during Combined Air Operations (COMAO). The Red Land is defended by opposing combat aircraft and surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems. Statistical studies are also completed in the White Headquarters.

To see if this annual exercise was scheduled on any of the dates involved in the Kumburgaz UFO incidents it's possible to cross check with the published AE exercise schedule posted by the Turkish Air Force. (listed below)

2007 to 2009 Anatolian Eagle Schedule


1 sighting date out of 23 occurred during the AE exercise.

The Kumburgaz case sightings and video dates were: 2007 -- June 22, July 30, Aug 1, Aug 7, Aug 10, Aug 12, Aug 24. 2008 -- May 23, May 27, May 29, June 8, June 9, June 11, June 12, June 16, July 2, July 4, Aug 30, Aug 31, 2009 -- May 13, May 14, May 15, May 17

In total there were 23 individual dates in which video was taken of something unknown in the sky near Turkey at varied lengths in minutes. Because almost all of the footage, 22 different segments, occurred on days when Anatolian Eagle was not taking place it's not likely to be the cause of whatever was filmed. The 6-22-07 segment was the only one that overlapped with Anatolian Eagle. As the investigation continues maybe we will learn of other exercises, however as it stands, there is nothing pointing in that direction.

Another reason Turkey's annual drill probably wasn't responsible for a misidentification is that it takes place in Konya which is 305 miles away from the sighting area and behind a mountain range.


Is There Any Evidence The Turkish Air Force Responded To The Unknown Objects?

Even though the answers to this question remain elusive, overall the case has shown insufficient credible evidence to reach any solid conclusion indicating jet or helicopter interaction. More analysis needs to be completed, however the 7 to 8 witnesses on record have not claimed to observe military jets nor hear any.

A couple factors might explain why nothing has surfaced demonstrating a military reaction.

-- The armed forces and Turkish Air Force are notorious for being highly secretive, generally more so than other democratic countries in the region. Based on their reputation if there was a TAF reaction the chances are that news media and the public wouldn't be briefed on the matter.

-- UFO sightings in Turkey are nothing surprising. Turkish culture is generally more accepting of esoteric subjects and over centuries of history has grown used to hearing stories of the paranormal. It could be possible that government authorities could be so accustomed to UFO sightings that it no longer uses valuable military resources to approach them unless near restricted air space zones.

But there have been several cases involving Turkish commercial pilots who have gone on the record with their UFO encounters. For example, recently reported in Sabah the recollections of two pilots who had encounters with UFOs. Turkish Airlines pilot Ibrahim Bilir says he believes in UFOs because he has seen one. According to Sabah, Bilir encountered the UFO five years ago on a flight from Osaka, Japan to Istanbul.


The following is Bilir’s account translated into English:

" Five years ago on the return from Osaka, continuing on the same route we included the team of four aircraft we saw that object. We came upon us out. Right continued over us on the cross. We saw a strong light, silver color and cannot take care of UFO shape We have not seen. He came to our very close. I did not believe UFOs, I believe that mission. “We were flying three pilots. 38 thousand feet in 6 hours after departure (11 thousand meters) 4 were flying plane in the same direction. In front of me again THY flight from Shanghai was there behind me Lufthansa aircraft. Upcoming we saw a strong light. He came to our very close . Silver color and do not look, do not open your eyes. An incredible power, there were ten forces. Different anything, burn your eyes. Our plane was seen in all three pilots. He came upon us out. He continued right above us on the cross. They were between 35-45 seconds . "Therefore see four teams simultaneously. Strange thing is that everyone thinks it onto itself. If it was hallucinating about a person, but the team has seen the four planes. It was a very bright light silver in color. It was so bright that it hurt their eyes to look at it directly. At least three pilots had seen the UFO."

The story also includes a second pilot sighting. This sighting was in October of 1989 on a flight from Zurich to the Turkish town of Antalya.

The pilot, TK Selahattin, told Sabah, again translated into English:
"I left later in Yugoslavia airspace, we have seen two thousand meters away from an object. First we thought the aircraft. However, the light cluster will attract our attention to the sharpness of what is wondering we have. Light set, passed in front of us after 10 minutes. Suddenly he took on three primary colors. several times the normal plane in a big way began to fly in front of us. They said they have not seen such a body when we contacted the Istanbul tower. Fields, scattering their multicolored lights rose to 44 thousand feet and turned into a ball of white light. Then he disappeared into sharp rises a white ball of light."

Both incidents occurred several years earlier than the Kumburgaz case and there is no evidence they are related. Special thanks to Openminds.tv for providing the story. Source

Were Any Military Jets Or Helicopters Filmed?

The next step is to try and determine if the raw footage captured any human aircraft, but it's not clear enough to know for sure. A trained independent video analyst would be needed to get closer to an answer. Even though there are a few areas of the film I have found that appear to show secondary objects, they realistically could be anything, but still raise the curiosity level. What were the other objects doing? Could they have an explanation?

Unfortunately it's too distant to see detail, but this July 30, 2007 video, shot by Yalcin from the balcony of his father's condo shows an object moving left to right eventually behind someone's chimney. We are left to purely speculative it's origin.



Both sequences were taken consecutively. Could it have been the exact object seen 25 minutes earlier in the same area or was it a helicopter? Because it's so hard to see we might never know the answer.


Next...

A seperate additional unidentified object is present in the May 15th, 2009 segment taken just after sunrise at 5:21 a.m. To the right of the four circular lights is another object.


An additional unknown object was filmed on May 15, 2009


Also on July 2, 2008


It is not entirely possible to conclude exactly what the additional orange lights were, but none the less, they are an interesting element that could benefit from more analysis. There are several factors which seem to point away from these additional objects being an F-16 or other military jet, such as traveling speed, the objects seem to hover motionless unlike a jet, and lack of other characteristics.

General Summary

-- There are several Air Force bases within a range of 200 miles from the sighting location. 2 of them have U.S. and NATO personel. With permission from Turkey, NATO is allowed to use their base to launch operations in Syria and Iraq.

-- Turkey itself, and no other nation, is in charge of handling a military response to unknown aircraft within the country's borders.

-- "Anatolian Eagle", the annual Air Force exercise in Turkey, apparently wasn't occurring during the sighting and video dates.

-- So far no eyewitnesses have come forward who observed or heard military jet activity.

-- Overall, during my investigation, I haven't found any solid evidence yet pointing towards any Turkish Air Force and/or military activity during the Kumburgaz case.